Seed NewsvineTelegram UK
Jesus crucifixion nails 'found'
Two of the nails used to crucify Jesus have been discovered in a 2,000-year-old tomb, according to a new film.
12:22PM BST 12 Apr 2011
_________________________
My Comment
Simcha needs to find a good lawyer to sue the school that provided him with a diploma or degree. After all, appears that Jacobovici never took a course in logic, or at least Common Sense 101. Therefore Jacobovici should ask for a full refund for his tuition, and for his academic fees, plus compensation for causing him to become clown-like.
Since archeologists and researches use folk stories and documentation to focus on some social research, it would be prudent for Mr. Simcha Jacobovici to have read the New Testament. There he would have noticed that logically the odds of probability would not have Caiaphas with Jesus’ cross nails.
Though, the New Testament appears to be used by Simcha, as Caiaphas is in Simcha’s mains reference, the New Testament is not followed by Jacobovici. If he used the New Testament as a basic source of reference, than why not read more, and why not know that Caiaphas was the enemy of Jesus. Therefore, the nails from the crucifixion of Jesus would have been treated by the High Priest with disdain.
Another logical point is that the New Testament Tells us that Joseph of Arimathaea asked Pilot for Jesus’ body, and got the body of Jesus. If any of the High Priests would have been present, it would probably be mentioned. But why would Caiaphas put someone to death and then ask for the nails?
A priest or any Jew would become unclean if he would touch a corpus or anything that had been in contact with the dead. Jesus came from the cross short before sunset. Just before the Passover starting at sunset. Common sense tells us that all faithful Jews were preparing for the Passover; therefore the High Priests would not have been present when Jesus’ body was taken from the cross.
Why than would the Roman soldiers keep separate the nails used to nail Jesus. Also, Pilot was not pleased with the High Priests for demanding Jesus’ crucifixion, for Pilot did not want to put Jesus to dead. Pilot washed his hands as a token of his innocence about the blood of Jesus. Thus, pilot would not keep the nails either.
The nails would have been associated with a criminal, as the High Priests accused Jesus of. That would make Caiaphas “unclean” if he would have touched the crucifixion nails. Such example is seen when the High Priests considered the money returned from Judas, as unclean; “They bought the potter’s field with that money, for it was unclean money.” Thus Mr. Simcha Jacobovici’s so called research is flawed from the beginning.
It is too bad that the anti-Jesus gang would come as low as to bring shame to and degrade archeology to make some money with another poorly concocted story contradicting the bible.
Poor simcha must be either or both crazy and or prepaid cionist (who is doing the whole work to prove that Jesus was only an ordinary person). You must have heard of an american-based campaigne ruled by both christians (the alcoholist george bush)and jews (maybe simcha?)to make a christian turn to a half jew.
ReplyDelete