http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012004349.html
I'm declaring February a Palin-free month. Join me!
By Dana Milbank
Friday, January 21, 2011
----------------------------------------------
My response:
Granted that Sara Palin in my viewpoint is a fox that crept into the playground, but abstaining from reading or writing about Palin is not the answer. Palin exists like Bush, and Obama, and Bin Laden or any other person whose existence is real.
So, what is the point buy you trying to force the media to ignore Sarah for a month and hope that she will disappear? Even when Clinton and Nixon were in the midst of their scandals, no one proposed silence about anyone. Not even about Monica L., and we were all tired of Bill and Monica in the news.
If your personal saturation with Palin is to the brim, abstaining for your personal benefit is great. It may help your purpose, and then you can start with a fresh perspective. But it is unfair to the audience to do the same.
It is natural and wise to know as much the people that we like, as it is to know about those we dislike. Otherwise, we would be unjust and ignorant. Fro we to comment or vote we need to know about both sides. That is why WikiLeaks and Assange became popular names. Even though WikiLeaks did cause embarrassment to us, we need to know the truth.
So whether we like Sarah Palin or not, we need to know what she is up to, good or bad. For, Plain does influence many people just like any other politician.
A moment
"I think, therefore I am"
Friday, January 21, 2011
It’s True
Digging Mom’s plot,
Found Dad’s skull,
Oh! You are here!
It’s true.
Ah, but, you, you talk!
It’s true.
Ah, but, skulls don’t talk!
It’s true.
Ah, then you are not dead!
It’s true.
I thought you were there!
It’s true.
The stones are misplaced!
It’s true.
Am I talking to you Father?
It’s true.
I sure do not understand this!
It’s true.
I am going through … some phase?
It’s true.
Well, you both will share the same plot!
Thanks, Son.
Found Dad’s skull,
Oh! You are here!
It’s true.
Ah, but, you, you talk!
It’s true.
Ah, but, skulls don’t talk!
It’s true.
Ah, then you are not dead!
It’s true.
I thought you were there!
It’s true.
The stones are misplaced!
It’s true.
Am I talking to you Father?
It’s true.
I sure do not understand this!
It’s true.
I am going through … some phase?
It’s true.
Well, you both will share the same plot!
Thanks, Son.
Kidnapped child finds home.
Solomon’s story 3,000 latter, again bad woman looses. According to both NY Times and ABC News, just like with Solomon, a woman stole a baby and claimed the baby her own. Also, like in the Bible’s story, the truth comes to light. Except this time the bad woman raises the child, and then the child found her way home to her real mom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/nyregion/20kidnap.html?ref=nyregion
The phenomenon of women losing their own children and robbing another woman’s child is scary, especially when there has been cases where nasty women went ad far as ripping the mother open and snatching the baby. Other women are sneakier, like this case where the babe was stolen, and raised under different identity.
Since 3,000 year ago there was no DNA, Solomon use wisdom and the sword. Like in modern times, the nasty woman was just concerned with her goal of having a child. Granted, some people do not qualify to adapt, but there are so many children waiting for a home. Let’s not be phobic about woman in the 20s and early 30s age group without children, and egger to be moms. It is more difficult in some instances, since men are being more cautious, because of child support. Women robbing children, is a very small number.
Perhaps the educational system should start to train children about real identity, and train girls to have children the proper way, and train boys that there is responsibility to raise children. It is a community effort to deter crime, and to avoid the life long scars of children that have been robed from their biological parents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/nyregion/20kidnap.html?ref=nyregion
The phenomenon of women losing their own children and robbing another woman’s child is scary, especially when there has been cases where nasty women went ad far as ripping the mother open and snatching the baby. Other women are sneakier, like this case where the babe was stolen, and raised under different identity.
Since 3,000 year ago there was no DNA, Solomon use wisdom and the sword. Like in modern times, the nasty woman was just concerned with her goal of having a child. Granted, some people do not qualify to adapt, but there are so many children waiting for a home. Let’s not be phobic about woman in the 20s and early 30s age group without children, and egger to be moms. It is more difficult in some instances, since men are being more cautious, because of child support. Women robbing children, is a very small number.
Perhaps the educational system should start to train children about real identity, and train girls to have children the proper way, and train boys that there is responsibility to raise children. It is a community effort to deter crime, and to avoid the life long scars of children that have been robed from their biological parents.
ARMAGEDON
The Rabbi, and Mullah,
The Preacher, and the Monk,
The Taoist, and Buddhist,
The Pagan, and the Priest.
And, the meeting was great,
No one was late,
All spoke of fate,
Running, for the gate.
Everyone is right,
Everyone in plight,
Then, all started to fight,
For, all wanted the light.
But, God is what it is.
And, Allah’s what it is.
And, Siva’s what it is.
And, Zeus’ what it is.
All in one accord,
Agreed, in one word,
The CREATOR is lord.
By DFF Leonardo 2006
The Preacher, and the Monk,
The Taoist, and Buddhist,
The Pagan, and the Priest.
And, the meeting was great,
No one was late,
All spoke of fate,
Running, for the gate.
Everyone is right,
Everyone in plight,
Then, all started to fight,
For, all wanted the light.
But, God is what it is.
And, Allah’s what it is.
And, Siva’s what it is.
And, Zeus’ what it is.
All in one accord,
Agreed, in one word,
The CREATOR is lord.
By DFF Leonardo 2006
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Retroactive-abortion, is it a crime?
The guy was paid to kill, so he did his job. So what is th problem? This is a Law-Washing.
Certification is just club membertship. The problem is what the guy was doing.
“…he said, the clinic used another doctor as a consultant so it could receive a license to perform abortions in 1979.” Get the other doctor for fraud.
This sounds like a third-world story. Granted, abortion is a hot topic and lots of it is going hiden from the public to cover-up activities, that is nothing new. But, women and children had been dying, and the government/city officals did nothing about it. Could this show that abortion means licent to kill, to preserve ideology.
These were not first trimester babies where the baby is barely complete; or second trimester abortions, where the baby has very little chance of survival; these were late term abortions. Chldren have lived after the fifth month. However, this mob were killing crying babies living on their own.
Even the DA is beig appologetic for enforcing the law. They should get a real district attorney.
All of this really ammounts to hypocracy from the government’s standpoint. So much hyperventilation about women’s rights and child abuse, and then reality comes: It is all about money and ideology.
Money and ideology are more important than women and children, acording to those government officials’ irresponsibilty and neglect, even though at lower level. This has been going on for almost ten years. They knew about it since 1993. Shame on those public officilas. Failure to do their job cust people their lives—accessory to murder.
Certification is just club membertship. The problem is what the guy was doing.
“…he said, the clinic used another doctor as a consultant so it could receive a license to perform abortions in 1979.” Get the other doctor for fraud.
This sounds like a third-world story. Granted, abortion is a hot topic and lots of it is going hiden from the public to cover-up activities, that is nothing new. But, women and children had been dying, and the government/city officals did nothing about it. Could this show that abortion means licent to kill, to preserve ideology.
These were not first trimester babies where the baby is barely complete; or second trimester abortions, where the baby has very little chance of survival; these were late term abortions. Chldren have lived after the fifth month. However, this mob were killing crying babies living on their own.
Even the DA is beig appologetic for enforcing the law. They should get a real district attorney.
All of this really ammounts to hypocracy from the government’s standpoint. So much hyperventilation about women’s rights and child abuse, and then reality comes: It is all about money and ideology.
Money and ideology are more important than women and children, acording to those government officials’ irresponsibilty and neglect, even though at lower level. This has been going on for almost ten years. They knew about it since 1993. Shame on those public officilas. Failure to do their job cust people their lives—accessory to murder.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Israel giving-up East Jerusalem, must be a Russian joke.
The only serious appearance about the Russian president’s help, is the fact that Medvedev was there in person. The rest appears to be over-obvious formality.
First, East Jerusalem is firm on Israel’s hand, and they will never let go—only fools would. Second, the fact that the meeting involved Russina interests on Jordan’s oil, proves that the meeting was not about peace; rather it was about oil—“memorandum”. Third, in the picture, the very posture of Medvedev, appeared not serious. The president is not even at attention like his counterpart.
As a president of a great nation, it is almost guaranteed that Medvedev knows how to address color-guard, especially when pictures are taken—of course he was the guest.
Perhaps there is a subliminal message about all of this. Russia’s over-suggesting may be the very clue hinting that the formal political visit was not about peace.
First, East Jerusalem is firm on Israel’s hand, and they will never let go—only fools would. Second, the fact that the meeting involved Russina interests on Jordan’s oil, proves that the meeting was not about peace; rather it was about oil—“memorandum”. Third, in the picture, the very posture of Medvedev, appeared not serious. The president is not even at attention like his counterpart.
As a president of a great nation, it is almost guaranteed that Medvedev knows how to address color-guard, especially when pictures are taken—of course he was the guest.
Perhaps there is a subliminal message about all of this. Russia’s over-suggesting may be the very clue hinting that the formal political visit was not about peace.
Republicans replacing Democrats against freedom.
While using the typical euphemism to deceive the public, Republicans are doing precisely what they have been accusing the Democrats of—forcing their will on the citizens. The Republicans forcing the poor to buy insurance is another ploy to help the capitalist sector with more revenue at the expense of the desperate.
Have the republicans ever consider why the poor have no insurance? No, they have note. Rich people have no idea about how it is to be poor. Ironically, the so called social safe-net programs only work for those who have nothing or are good with fraud.
The person who is working and is trying to keep a house, are those who will be ripped by Romnism. Mitt Romney forced MA citizens to buy health insurance. Did all the poor in Massachusetts buy health care. Well, those who already had a tight budget, got it tighter by the Mitt Romney’s concept. Because, the euphemism called incentives means that those who did not have enough to buy health insurance because of the punishment trickery designed into the project.
Those in poverty, already have health insurance from government programs. It is those who try to be off the welfare system that get punished by Romnism. The money that would normally keep the house barely warm and the milk on the table will be going to the banking account of insurance companies. Poor people not in welfare have to choose; otherwise they loose their property-homes to taxes.
If Mitt Romney was serious about helping the people, he would have proposed something in the area of having doctors who get mega federal help in education to return some percentage of the time in the form of free or reduced services to the poor. The same could be done with the pharmaceutical companies with research.
Giving back something back is not a sin or a crime. It is a duty. However, a program like that would not bring more money to the capitalist-vultures. It would not bring up the stock market either. It would just help the citizens—Not a capitalist goal. Unfortunately, Romnism
Is synonymous with Sovietism or forced communism, where the government ruled by forcing the people into whatever pleased the tyrants. Romnism is un-American.
If the GOP is bringing this up knowingly that they can not override the veto, they the Republicans are simply misusing their time and our money to show that they can. We will vote again.
Have the republicans ever consider why the poor have no insurance? No, they have note. Rich people have no idea about how it is to be poor. Ironically, the so called social safe-net programs only work for those who have nothing or are good with fraud.
The person who is working and is trying to keep a house, are those who will be ripped by Romnism. Mitt Romney forced MA citizens to buy health insurance. Did all the poor in Massachusetts buy health care. Well, those who already had a tight budget, got it tighter by the Mitt Romney’s concept. Because, the euphemism called incentives means that those who did not have enough to buy health insurance because of the punishment trickery designed into the project.
Those in poverty, already have health insurance from government programs. It is those who try to be off the welfare system that get punished by Romnism. The money that would normally keep the house barely warm and the milk on the table will be going to the banking account of insurance companies. Poor people not in welfare have to choose; otherwise they loose their property-homes to taxes.
If Mitt Romney was serious about helping the people, he would have proposed something in the area of having doctors who get mega federal help in education to return some percentage of the time in the form of free or reduced services to the poor. The same could be done with the pharmaceutical companies with research.
Giving back something back is not a sin or a crime. It is a duty. However, a program like that would not bring more money to the capitalist-vultures. It would not bring up the stock market either. It would just help the citizens—Not a capitalist goal. Unfortunately, Romnism
Is synonymous with Sovietism or forced communism, where the government ruled by forcing the people into whatever pleased the tyrants. Romnism is un-American.
If the GOP is bringing this up knowingly that they can not override the veto, they the Republicans are simply misusing their time and our money to show that they can. We will vote again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)