accessory to Israel's destruction.
Obama II is anti Israel
Pre 67 borders?
If Israel is so bad try Hamas and the Taliban.
Yes, Obama II, is out of touch. Seems that Obama IIs, upbringing as a Muslim is more active than being the President of the US, and standing by the Jews. Let’s never forget that Hamas's goal is to destroy Israel, and Barack Hussein Obama II is being an accessory to Israel's destruction.
Yes, Israel should compensate those refugees who use to live in Israel and lost property. In return the Refugees should take the money and make peace with Israel. the land of Cannan was given to Israel by God. It is the only place where the Jews are in control od themselves; while the Palestinians are about two thirds of Jordan, and control Lebanon.
So where is reality? in Obama IIs agenda. Seems that Obama is giving the Hamas so much power that when the Palestinians and the Arabs/Syria, Egypt etc will push Israel to a corner like in 1973, Armageddon will become reality. The whole world will pay for Obama IIs miserable mistakes. Nukes know no borders. If Israel goes, they will take allot of their enemies with them.
A moment
"I think, therefore I am"
Showing posts with label Obama - birthers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama - birthers. Show all posts
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Washington Post (From AP)
Hawaii law bars release of Obama birth info
By MARK NIESSE
The Associated Press
Saturday, January 22, 2011; 4:56 AM
----------------------------------------------
My comment:
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Are birthers in a euphemist-racist trip? It appears to be true. The issue would never have started if Barack Hussein Obama II had any resemblance to George W. Bush, Sara Palin, or Rush Limbaugh. According to Jocelyn Novak, in The Associated Press, they are all 10th level cousins.
Even if Obama had been born in Africa, as some claim, he could still be a US born citizen.
For a child born overseas to a US citizen, becoming a US citizen is very simple. The US citizen abroad, upon becoming a parent, has up to two years to declare the child’s birth at the local US embassy—probably a US consulate too. All it takes is for the US parent to take all hospital or maternity certification from where the child was born, accompanied by other requested documents. When it is all processed the child receives a consular birth certificate of US citizenship. It is a federal document.
Based on birth declaration alone, Obama would have been a US born citizen, because his mother was an American. However, according to Hawaii vital records, Obama was born in Hawaii. http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html If such official evidence is not enough for the birthers, than they may have either an ignorance problem or racism is running in their minds.
If citizenship was any different, than the thousands of children born to US soldiers overseas would not have the same rights as their siblings born in US soil. Also, that means the children of US diplomats as well, and the children of US citizens working abroad.
When the founding fathers put the clause of US birth being a requirement for presidency, it was to exclude immigrants from ruling our country. It was for our protection. Now, birthers are taking the letter of the law into an extreme. The birthers are wrong.
Obama on the other hand, is being smart, even if he is not being insulted. Other presidents have made their records public, such as health records. If Obama would show or authorize his birth certificate to be disclosed, that would be the end of the case. His opposition probably would not look bad; but by ignoring his enemies, the President is letting them torching themselves with their own fire. In that case Obama makes since, even as a liberal.
In the name of nationalism and zealous citizenship, birthers are doing a disservice to the United States. For, their actions imply that our President is not legally in office. Of course political rivalry brings dirty tricks, and lots of false propaganda; but, Obama’s citizenship being questioned just identifies who the birthers really are. Research and be honest folks, it saves embarrassment.
---------------------------------
Next week: What hypnotism really is, and is not.
Hawaii law bars release of Obama birth info
By MARK NIESSE
The Associated Press
Saturday, January 22, 2011; 4:56 AM
----------------------------------------------
My comment:
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Are birthers in a euphemist-racist trip? It appears to be true. The issue would never have started if Barack Hussein Obama II had any resemblance to George W. Bush, Sara Palin, or Rush Limbaugh. According to Jocelyn Novak, in The Associated Press, they are all 10th level cousins.
Even if Obama had been born in Africa, as some claim, he could still be a US born citizen.
For a child born overseas to a US citizen, becoming a US citizen is very simple. The US citizen abroad, upon becoming a parent, has up to two years to declare the child’s birth at the local US embassy—probably a US consulate too. All it takes is for the US parent to take all hospital or maternity certification from where the child was born, accompanied by other requested documents. When it is all processed the child receives a consular birth certificate of US citizenship. It is a federal document.
Based on birth declaration alone, Obama would have been a US born citizen, because his mother was an American. However, according to Hawaii vital records, Obama was born in Hawaii. http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html If such official evidence is not enough for the birthers, than they may have either an ignorance problem or racism is running in their minds.
If citizenship was any different, than the thousands of children born to US soldiers overseas would not have the same rights as their siblings born in US soil. Also, that means the children of US diplomats as well, and the children of US citizens working abroad.
When the founding fathers put the clause of US birth being a requirement for presidency, it was to exclude immigrants from ruling our country. It was for our protection. Now, birthers are taking the letter of the law into an extreme. The birthers are wrong.
Obama on the other hand, is being smart, even if he is not being insulted. Other presidents have made their records public, such as health records. If Obama would show or authorize his birth certificate to be disclosed, that would be the end of the case. His opposition probably would not look bad; but by ignoring his enemies, the President is letting them torching themselves with their own fire. In that case Obama makes since, even as a liberal.
In the name of nationalism and zealous citizenship, birthers are doing a disservice to the United States. For, their actions imply that our President is not legally in office. Of course political rivalry brings dirty tricks, and lots of false propaganda; but, Obama’s citizenship being questioned just identifies who the birthers really are. Research and be honest folks, it saves embarrassment.
---------------------------------
Next week: What hypnotism really is, and is not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)