Not fair: Sarah Palin

Not fair: Sarah Palin may have been and extremist when she indirectly called for Assange’s assassination. However the media can not attribute Arizona’s incident to Palin unless they also credit Palin for deterring crime when law-abiding citizens protect themselves. The liberals can not have it both ways. Where was the editor?

Marriage debate-hate card

*******

Response to author/article

By Matthew J. Franck

Friday, December 17, 2010

In the gay marriage debate, stop playing the hate card

(Seen today on the Web Jan 11, 2011)

Hate and race rhetoric crutches are not the answer to homosexuality and the social division in both the USA and around the world. There is more at stake, and there is plenty of sophistication to destroy the family and religion as we know. Of course the leftists have a point in the area of false religion or religion for profit—thus hypocrisy.

If the whining is about equal rights for loved ones, than civil unions provide the benefits and authority over loved ones’ needs. However, hate from the homosexual community overcomes their false appearance of tolerance. Their crying over Prop 8 is evidence.

Marriage is a Godly institution, even though it has been abused by both religious and secular people alike. From the secular viewpoint, the homosexual community appears correct. However, from the perspective of those who regard God as a continuation of life, the situation of marriage is a sacred and eternal perspective of raising a family and following God’s commandments. Two distinctive perspectives.

From those who follow God’s commandments, sometimes lack of knowledge about their own scriptures becomes the reason for them looking differently on those who choose alternative life stiles. Nevertheless, Jesus told the woman caught in the act of sexual misbehavior to repent and sin no more”. He did not condemn, nor should anyone condemn homosexuals or others of different persuasion. But condemning is different from analyzing a situation and declaring it as right or wrong in ones’ own right.

It is like smoking. If someone wants to smoke it is OK if they smoke as long as their second hand smoke does not affect me or my family. But if it does affect someone, than the smoker needs to understand and respect others to.

The core of the argument comes to right and wrong from each other’s viewpoint. However, in our schools, the homosexual community has sneaked in the two moms and two dads concept as a normal situation. That is just as offensive to honest religious people as it is to mock the Muslim faith or its concepts. We are starting to be tolerable of the Muslims’ believes, but we need to respect other religions as well, that means the Judeo-Christian believes too.

The sublimed focus of the homosexual community is to dismantle religion in order to silent those who believe in God. For, if no one follows God’s commandments, than no one will say that sex-out of the marriage [male-female] is wrong.

There is already talk about making some biblical teachings illegal, because it offends homosexuals and other sexual active people of none marriage status.

The situation is about breaking families apart, and it will not go away, for homosexuality has been around for millennia and will continue. People are free to make choices. Both sides need to respect their own perimeters. The situation is not about just homosexuals it is about the sacredness of sex and the teachings from God’s perspective vs. the humanist viewpoint. NEGOTIATE.

Wife with milk-shake killed husband

From: San Jose Mercury News

Wife with milk-shake killed husband

If he was abusive, than why did Nancy no file for divorce? Could it be that not enough money would come her way. However, if the husband would be declared dead, she probably could have much more of that filthy-no-good money.

by Canadian group The Guess Who American woman, stay away from me / American woman, mama let me be / Don't come hanging around my door / I don't want to see your face no more …

If this would follow the American judicial system, she probably would be considered justified, or at least mental incompetent at the time she fulfilled her plan.

If you are poor you suffer because of hunger to pay child support, if you rich, they kill you for your money. May be better to be poor, at least you live. Where is justice?

Check my blog, this week more about injustice against men.

http://thelionscribe.blogspot.com/

Is this the end of literature?

The Tucson Arizona shooter

Seems that the guy is out of his mind, but he still knows what he is doing. Even though the cops appear to have been giving him a workout, if his broses did not happen during the scuffle at the shooting site, he seems to be in control.

He is clever, he knows that most likely he will not get less than the death penalty. He planed it, as the note stated. So, now though painfully as it may be, he is having fun with the cops, by not saying a word. The worse they can do him is killing him. Perhaps he is looking forward to being killed by the cops to avoid the sentence. Maybe in his mind he wants to be both the hero-killer and the martyr at the cops’ hands.

The logic part is that everybody knows that he is the killer, any other information would probably hurt people he knows. Let’s see how much pain he can endure before he opens-up. Perhaps they will give him a clandestine assignment of counter intelligence. He appears to be secret proof; and probably ultra-nationalist.

Why did the C College not try to help this guy? Appear that another student pretty much analyzed him well. Didn’t the other college shooter on the east coast also have connections with poetry or literature. The art of poetry and literature can be deep into macabre, and yet it is presented as normal art work such as the poem “Thanathopsis” by William Cullen Bryant, and Poe’s Cask of Amontillado , and Falkner’s “A Rose for Emily” among others.

US Grandjurying Icelandic

Are we cutting our own values to prove a point?

First: Where is journalistic protection. The only difference between WikiLeaks and the Associated Press is that AP works with governments, while WL is free—at least up to know.

Second: This is bad precedent. If the US will go on with trying in prosecuting foreign nationals for what they say or do outside of the US, than China and other countries will do the same to us for what we say and do inside the USA against that particular country. The end of freedom of speech—the USA’s flagship.

How far could that get? China prosecuting US’s business people for selling goods to Taiwan, or for working in something that the Chinese might consider bad for China.

Than of course we also might wonder about the: 9/11 Pentagon Conspiracy www.trutv.com/video/conspiracy-theory/pentagon-conspiracy.html

I believe that we should focus on a solid PR operation that would make us stronger and gain our lost respect, rather than driving our friends away from us while giving our enemies a cause against us.

Atheists vs. Bible

The entire atheist problem can be slaved quickly to honest atheists, and can become more complex to the dishonest unbelievers. All that the atheists need to do is read the bible on the context of its time and of its progress. They would not sound ignorant, for they would have knowledge instead of using single paragraphs to state their opinion. Moreover, as it is stated on the bible there are spiritual manifestations, also known as the supernatural.

The problem is that humans can not control the supernatural, therefore making it not scientific verifiable. Those who have such experiences don’t talk about it because there is much falsehood in this area too, as well as mockery.

On the other hand, it is the immaturity and the lack of knowledge of many religions people that feed the atheists’ argument. But, the atheists are correct in many areas, because of modern day “Judas’” religious profiteers. Many in religion are hypocrites and professional preachers who put their interests above God’s will.

God has a purpose and God has His own laws. This area of God’s laws is what makes the atheists tumble, because they judge God by man’s understanding—their own creation of truth and reason based on human opinion. Check me on twitter.

Parental neutral passport

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/07/passport-applications-soon-gender-neutral

Where were the Fox editors? The article contradicts itself. First, it says: “Sprague said the decision to remove the traditional parenting names was not an act of political correctness.” And then it states: “She still had to put her name in the father field,” This is precisely the Feminist/homosexual agenda omitting the word father.

Now the fairness of the US government will be seen here. Let’s see if they will apply that terminology in court, where bias guarantees favoring the mother. Where is justice? Where are the Congress kids? Appears that congress is still not helping the people in general; but, they seem to remember those to whom they sell their votes in exchange for contributions of time with posters or cash.

*