I just wished to be with a friend,
As the rain fell almost without end,
But, the only company was the dark night
Disturbed by each passing car’s beams of light.
Each day presented its test.
Inside an old small car’s best,
But, the real painful test was yet to come,
When talking to those pious who did sleep at home.
Only a divorced man can see,
To be tested for temper and honesty,
How much it hurts to be treated like a tree,
Laughed at, mocked and falsely accused of dishonesty.
I can tell you why, if you let me explain.
There is nothing to explain, suffer the pain!
So, you broke the law, did not inspect your car.
It serves you well, negligence and luck can only go so far.
They say: It is a matter of managing your money well!
In reality, the truth about real misery, only some can tell.
The fat cats laugh at you, calling you lazy even when you cry.
Searching and searching, you can’t get a job, no matter how honest you try.
Understanding that men are not trees,
Only those who have been hungry and cold and without utilities.
While those who make the laws never lack basics, comforts, and amenities;
The system by euphemism, their business’ masters supply them with elections and luxuries.
By DFF Leonardo -- 2005
A moment
"I think, therefore I am"
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Washington Post (From AP)
Hawaii law bars release of Obama birth info
By MARK NIESSE
The Associated Press
Saturday, January 22, 2011; 4:56 AM
----------------------------------------------
My comment:
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Are birthers in a euphemist-racist trip? It appears to be true. The issue would never have started if Barack Hussein Obama II had any resemblance to George W. Bush, Sara Palin, or Rush Limbaugh. According to Jocelyn Novak, in The Associated Press, they are all 10th level cousins.
Even if Obama had been born in Africa, as some claim, he could still be a US born citizen.
For a child born overseas to a US citizen, becoming a US citizen is very simple. The US citizen abroad, upon becoming a parent, has up to two years to declare the child’s birth at the local US embassy—probably a US consulate too. All it takes is for the US parent to take all hospital or maternity certification from where the child was born, accompanied by other requested documents. When it is all processed the child receives a consular birth certificate of US citizenship. It is a federal document.
Based on birth declaration alone, Obama would have been a US born citizen, because his mother was an American. However, according to Hawaii vital records, Obama was born in Hawaii. http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html If such official evidence is not enough for the birthers, than they may have either an ignorance problem or racism is running in their minds.
If citizenship was any different, than the thousands of children born to US soldiers overseas would not have the same rights as their siblings born in US soil. Also, that means the children of US diplomats as well, and the children of US citizens working abroad.
When the founding fathers put the clause of US birth being a requirement for presidency, it was to exclude immigrants from ruling our country. It was for our protection. Now, birthers are taking the letter of the law into an extreme. The birthers are wrong.
Obama on the other hand, is being smart, even if he is not being insulted. Other presidents have made their records public, such as health records. If Obama would show or authorize his birth certificate to be disclosed, that would be the end of the case. His opposition probably would not look bad; but by ignoring his enemies, the President is letting them torching themselves with their own fire. In that case Obama makes since, even as a liberal.
In the name of nationalism and zealous citizenship, birthers are doing a disservice to the United States. For, their actions imply that our President is not legally in office. Of course political rivalry brings dirty tricks, and lots of false propaganda; but, Obama’s citizenship being questioned just identifies who the birthers really are. Research and be honest folks, it saves embarrassment.
---------------------------------
Next week: What hypnotism really is, and is not.
Hawaii law bars release of Obama birth info
By MARK NIESSE
The Associated Press
Saturday, January 22, 2011; 4:56 AM
----------------------------------------------
My comment:
Obama is right, birthers are wrong.
Are birthers in a euphemist-racist trip? It appears to be true. The issue would never have started if Barack Hussein Obama II had any resemblance to George W. Bush, Sara Palin, or Rush Limbaugh. According to Jocelyn Novak, in The Associated Press, they are all 10th level cousins.
Even if Obama had been born in Africa, as some claim, he could still be a US born citizen.
For a child born overseas to a US citizen, becoming a US citizen is very simple. The US citizen abroad, upon becoming a parent, has up to two years to declare the child’s birth at the local US embassy—probably a US consulate too. All it takes is for the US parent to take all hospital or maternity certification from where the child was born, accompanied by other requested documents. When it is all processed the child receives a consular birth certificate of US citizenship. It is a federal document.
Based on birth declaration alone, Obama would have been a US born citizen, because his mother was an American. However, according to Hawaii vital records, Obama was born in Hawaii. http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html If such official evidence is not enough for the birthers, than they may have either an ignorance problem or racism is running in their minds.
If citizenship was any different, than the thousands of children born to US soldiers overseas would not have the same rights as their siblings born in US soil. Also, that means the children of US diplomats as well, and the children of US citizens working abroad.
When the founding fathers put the clause of US birth being a requirement for presidency, it was to exclude immigrants from ruling our country. It was for our protection. Now, birthers are taking the letter of the law into an extreme. The birthers are wrong.
Obama on the other hand, is being smart, even if he is not being insulted. Other presidents have made their records public, such as health records. If Obama would show or authorize his birth certificate to be disclosed, that would be the end of the case. His opposition probably would not look bad; but by ignoring his enemies, the President is letting them torching themselves with their own fire. In that case Obama makes since, even as a liberal.
In the name of nationalism and zealous citizenship, birthers are doing a disservice to the United States. For, their actions imply that our President is not legally in office. Of course political rivalry brings dirty tricks, and lots of false propaganda; but, Obama’s citizenship being questioned just identifies who the birthers really are. Research and be honest folks, it saves embarrassment.
---------------------------------
Next week: What hypnotism really is, and is not.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Palin---Journalism's -Clever subliminal manipulation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012004349.html
I'm declaring February a Palin-free month. Join me!
By Dana Milbank
Friday, January 21, 2011
----------------------------------------------
My response:
Granted that Sara Palin in my viewpoint is a fox that crept into the playground, but abstaining from reading or writing about Palin is not the answer. Palin exists like Bush, and Obama, and Bin Laden or any other person whose existence is real.
So, what is the point buy you trying to force the media to ignore Sarah for a month and hope that she will disappear? Even when Clinton and Nixon were in the midst of their scandals, no one proposed silence about anyone. Not even about Monica L., and we were all tired of Bill and Monica in the news.
If your personal saturation with Palin is to the brim, abstaining for your personal benefit is great. It may help your purpose, and then you can start with a fresh perspective. But it is unfair to the audience to do the same.
It is natural and wise to know as much the people that we like, as it is to know about those we dislike. Otherwise, we would be unjust and ignorant. Fro we to comment or vote we need to know about both sides. That is why WikiLeaks and Assange became popular names. Even though WikiLeaks did cause embarrassment to us, we need to know the truth.
So whether we like Sarah Palin or not, we need to know what she is up to, good or bad. For, Plain does influence many people just like any other politician.
I'm declaring February a Palin-free month. Join me!
By Dana Milbank
Friday, January 21, 2011
----------------------------------------------
My response:
Granted that Sara Palin in my viewpoint is a fox that crept into the playground, but abstaining from reading or writing about Palin is not the answer. Palin exists like Bush, and Obama, and Bin Laden or any other person whose existence is real.
So, what is the point buy you trying to force the media to ignore Sarah for a month and hope that she will disappear? Even when Clinton and Nixon were in the midst of their scandals, no one proposed silence about anyone. Not even about Monica L., and we were all tired of Bill and Monica in the news.
If your personal saturation with Palin is to the brim, abstaining for your personal benefit is great. It may help your purpose, and then you can start with a fresh perspective. But it is unfair to the audience to do the same.
It is natural and wise to know as much the people that we like, as it is to know about those we dislike. Otherwise, we would be unjust and ignorant. Fro we to comment or vote we need to know about both sides. That is why WikiLeaks and Assange became popular names. Even though WikiLeaks did cause embarrassment to us, we need to know the truth.
So whether we like Sarah Palin or not, we need to know what she is up to, good or bad. For, Plain does influence many people just like any other politician.
It’s True
Digging Mom’s plot,
Found Dad’s skull,
Oh! You are here!
It’s true.
Ah, but, you, you talk!
It’s true.
Ah, but, skulls don’t talk!
It’s true.
Ah, then you are not dead!
It’s true.
I thought you were there!
It’s true.
The stones are misplaced!
It’s true.
Am I talking to you Father?
It’s true.
I sure do not understand this!
It’s true.
I am going through … some phase?
It’s true.
Well, you both will share the same plot!
Thanks, Son.
Found Dad’s skull,
Oh! You are here!
It’s true.
Ah, but, you, you talk!
It’s true.
Ah, but, skulls don’t talk!
It’s true.
Ah, then you are not dead!
It’s true.
I thought you were there!
It’s true.
The stones are misplaced!
It’s true.
Am I talking to you Father?
It’s true.
I sure do not understand this!
It’s true.
I am going through … some phase?
It’s true.
Well, you both will share the same plot!
Thanks, Son.
Kidnapped child finds home.
Solomon’s story 3,000 latter, again bad woman looses. According to both NY Times and ABC News, just like with Solomon, a woman stole a baby and claimed the baby her own. Also, like in the Bible’s story, the truth comes to light. Except this time the bad woman raises the child, and then the child found her way home to her real mom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/nyregion/20kidnap.html?ref=nyregion
The phenomenon of women losing their own children and robbing another woman’s child is scary, especially when there has been cases where nasty women went ad far as ripping the mother open and snatching the baby. Other women are sneakier, like this case where the babe was stolen, and raised under different identity.
Since 3,000 year ago there was no DNA, Solomon use wisdom and the sword. Like in modern times, the nasty woman was just concerned with her goal of having a child. Granted, some people do not qualify to adapt, but there are so many children waiting for a home. Let’s not be phobic about woman in the 20s and early 30s age group without children, and egger to be moms. It is more difficult in some instances, since men are being more cautious, because of child support. Women robbing children, is a very small number.
Perhaps the educational system should start to train children about real identity, and train girls to have children the proper way, and train boys that there is responsibility to raise children. It is a community effort to deter crime, and to avoid the life long scars of children that have been robed from their biological parents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/nyregion/20kidnap.html?ref=nyregion
The phenomenon of women losing their own children and robbing another woman’s child is scary, especially when there has been cases where nasty women went ad far as ripping the mother open and snatching the baby. Other women are sneakier, like this case where the babe was stolen, and raised under different identity.
Since 3,000 year ago there was no DNA, Solomon use wisdom and the sword. Like in modern times, the nasty woman was just concerned with her goal of having a child. Granted, some people do not qualify to adapt, but there are so many children waiting for a home. Let’s not be phobic about woman in the 20s and early 30s age group without children, and egger to be moms. It is more difficult in some instances, since men are being more cautious, because of child support. Women robbing children, is a very small number.
Perhaps the educational system should start to train children about real identity, and train girls to have children the proper way, and train boys that there is responsibility to raise children. It is a community effort to deter crime, and to avoid the life long scars of children that have been robed from their biological parents.
ARMAGEDON
The Rabbi, and Mullah,
The Preacher, and the Monk,
The Taoist, and Buddhist,
The Pagan, and the Priest.
And, the meeting was great,
No one was late,
All spoke of fate,
Running, for the gate.
Everyone is right,
Everyone in plight,
Then, all started to fight,
For, all wanted the light.
But, God is what it is.
And, Allah’s what it is.
And, Siva’s what it is.
And, Zeus’ what it is.
All in one accord,
Agreed, in one word,
The CREATOR is lord.
By DFF Leonardo 2006
The Preacher, and the Monk,
The Taoist, and Buddhist,
The Pagan, and the Priest.
And, the meeting was great,
No one was late,
All spoke of fate,
Running, for the gate.
Everyone is right,
Everyone in plight,
Then, all started to fight,
For, all wanted the light.
But, God is what it is.
And, Allah’s what it is.
And, Siva’s what it is.
And, Zeus’ what it is.
All in one accord,
Agreed, in one word,
The CREATOR is lord.
By DFF Leonardo 2006
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Retroactive-abortion, is it a crime?
The guy was paid to kill, so he did his job. So what is th problem? This is a Law-Washing.
Certification is just club membertship. The problem is what the guy was doing.
“…he said, the clinic used another doctor as a consultant so it could receive a license to perform abortions in 1979.” Get the other doctor for fraud.
This sounds like a third-world story. Granted, abortion is a hot topic and lots of it is going hiden from the public to cover-up activities, that is nothing new. But, women and children had been dying, and the government/city officals did nothing about it. Could this show that abortion means licent to kill, to preserve ideology.
These were not first trimester babies where the baby is barely complete; or second trimester abortions, where the baby has very little chance of survival; these were late term abortions. Chldren have lived after the fifth month. However, this mob were killing crying babies living on their own.
Even the DA is beig appologetic for enforcing the law. They should get a real district attorney.
All of this really ammounts to hypocracy from the government’s standpoint. So much hyperventilation about women’s rights and child abuse, and then reality comes: It is all about money and ideology.
Money and ideology are more important than women and children, acording to those government officials’ irresponsibilty and neglect, even though at lower level. This has been going on for almost ten years. They knew about it since 1993. Shame on those public officilas. Failure to do their job cust people their lives—accessory to murder.
Certification is just club membertship. The problem is what the guy was doing.
“…he said, the clinic used another doctor as a consultant so it could receive a license to perform abortions in 1979.” Get the other doctor for fraud.
This sounds like a third-world story. Granted, abortion is a hot topic and lots of it is going hiden from the public to cover-up activities, that is nothing new. But, women and children had been dying, and the government/city officals did nothing about it. Could this show that abortion means licent to kill, to preserve ideology.
These were not first trimester babies where the baby is barely complete; or second trimester abortions, where the baby has very little chance of survival; these were late term abortions. Chldren have lived after the fifth month. However, this mob were killing crying babies living on their own.
Even the DA is beig appologetic for enforcing the law. They should get a real district attorney.
All of this really ammounts to hypocracy from the government’s standpoint. So much hyperventilation about women’s rights and child abuse, and then reality comes: It is all about money and ideology.
Money and ideology are more important than women and children, acording to those government officials’ irresponsibilty and neglect, even though at lower level. This has been going on for almost ten years. They knew about it since 1993. Shame on those public officilas. Failure to do their job cust people their lives—accessory to murder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)