Seed Newsvine

http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/02/pf/expert/money_marriage/
From
CNN Money

By Walter Updegrave @CNNMoney December 2, 2011: 3:16 PM ET
Talk money with your spouse -- and keep the peace

----------------------------

My take

The problem is:
What are you going to do when your wife starts to shout each time you suggest a plan. As long as she has her way, there is peace at home.

Oh, and please, never go on her wallet; because, you may find her secret credit cards; that will just show you her deceitful-partnership is in the marriage. Also, don’t try to have a budget, because what you will propose, if it puts any restriction on her spending, your wife will accuse you of tyranny, even when your spending is controlled by her.

Common, when you ask for her to sit and make a plan, she simply says, “We don’t make enough to have budget.” This is Feminism at its best. If you go to court, she will accuse of bossing her and being a tyrant; simple because you wanted to have a say in the house. And in any American court a women’s lie against her husband is sacred.

Forget about church’s help, the religious crowd will chastise you for being a tyrant, because you dared to make suggestions that your wife objected. They will not say it in simple language, they will just say ‘You two need to communicate better”. They will give you examples of happiness in the family when a husband listens (submits) to the wife). They even will give you examples of how wrong they learned they were, when their wives told them so.

Bu they will never mention a wife’s fallacy, or if they do is about common irrelevant situations. Nor do they encourage the wife to also listen to the husband. They will just tell the husband to list more to the wife.

Bottom line, if your wife “Was born to shop”, it does not matter; you are doomed. Just roll with the punches, turn the blind eye, and just exist. Hint, don’t bother looking at other women, for at that point, they all look pretty; and you get tempted, and then your wife will finally have something truthful to accuse of you of; afterwards, you are a no-good creature.

Just pray and be happy, or at least try to pretend to be happy in front of your children. Other men normally will deny it, but a few will open-up and tell you how Hell feels like, after a men failed to have a plan in choosing a wife. Whatever you do, be aware, the children are simply victims, even when they see their father as an encumbrance on their mother. Maternal brainwash is the worst form or terrorism.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/07/inappropriate-relationship-is-possible-motive-in-penis-severing-case/1?csp=obinsite

From:
USA TODAY
By Douglas Stanglin, USA TODAY
'Inappropriate relationship' is possible motive in penis-severing case


-------------
MY TAKE

If any similar mutilation would have been done by a husband to his wife, all the feminists and “woman-defenders” would be crying from the bottom of their lungs; but since the crime was done by a wife who showed no regrets and like normal feminists appears above the law, the author focused on the reason. Justification is normally used by criminals; thus the author appears as a crime condoner. The media in this case appears to look for a reason to justify another wife mutilating her husband.

A similar reaction appeared on a major American publisher—I don’t remember which, could research; in the case of the mom-Smith who murdered her children with her car to the pond. Case after case about vicious mothers and vicious wives are normally reported in apologetic mode. After all there is a judicial process, and the courts normally favor kindness to women over men. So, takes the law into her own hands was more pleasing—feminism at its best.

Where is the rage and the call for justice and the adjectives that would be used in this article if the crime was from the husband to wife. Heavy language is normally used for criminals when men commit similar crimes against woman? Instead, Douglas Stanglin, writes as if all is normal, or if that criminal wife could be justified.

USA TODAY’s editors are no better than the article’s author. Such tone to justify violence from women is adding fuel to the barbaric violence cycle flooding our society in the space age. Just as bad are the religious preachers who only see the negative of men’s crimes, but remain silent when women are the culprits; silence is approval.