War on Drugs or you your money?

It is not worthy to repeat what has been said so many times before, rather it might be prudent to point at the proven evidence of exactly one century ago. The same scenario with brain sensitive substances. But, the results are so good, that I have to make reference to Prohibition.

About a century ago, tyrants decided to influence the government to act in tyranny and oppress the people by “Prohibition”. In the nation of the “Free”, the people sought to be free and ignored tyranny. Since alcohol became illegal, and whatever is illegal makes people question why, unless it is something bad, restriction entices people to looked into it, to see why. But, yes, alcohol is a drug and is bad.

Thus criminals prospered by “crime”, only criminals had access to manufacturing, selling and distributing whine and alcoholic products. Since there was no other way to get what for thousands of years had been free, territorial wars were common; thus murder was part of business. The force of capitalism was in control under the nose of government that said you could not do it.

Then the spirit of common since prevailed by the influence of capitalism still. The government decided to have a share on that criminal trade. We ended up with a government department dealing with Tobacco Alcohol and Firearms—growth in government, that is good for politicians. Better yet, now all those criminal substances that had been used freely for thousands of years before prohibition, became free again—but, only if you pay the government—it sounds like taxes.

Now, governments around the world have an excuse to tax tobacco and alcohol, more government growth. It makes politicians appear as if they really care for the people who voted them into office. Since the governments assumed the role of the criminals, those alcoholic substances became controllable, with permits to the same criminals who had not gotten caught.

Politicians around the world demonstrated what the law of prohibition was. Alcohol is part of their entertainment, as it has been for thousands of years, for everyone else.

Now, we even have an ex-President who refused to say he never used drugs, rather Mr. Clinton said that he “…did not inhale it”. No one can be present where smoke is present without inhaling it. It has been classified as “secondhand smoke”, in Clinton’s case “grass smoking”.

However, the war on drugs has a different base. First its source is South America, legalizing drugs would allow large sums of money into the coffers of the Latinos—no way. Secondly, the Latinos could become financially independent. In contrast we had big grain farms to produce alcohol; but coco is a natural near the Equator. Thirdly, there is a real cultural threat. Some Latino clown once bragged that he would intoxicate America—the same way, the English enslaved the Asians with the opium business two centuries ago.

But, those are small potatoes, when we compare that the war on drugs allowed governments around the world to control your money. If anyone deposits or makes transactions of $10,000 or more, the government has to be notified. It is called financial or property oppression. That is how the European governments controlled the Jews for centuries, by taking their property.

In the sixteen hundreds, the English did come to the conclusion that the ultimate weapon is not the sword, rather, it is the control of money. Without the war on drugs there does not appear a validity for governments to control your money.

Reality: Any substance altering the thinking process is bad and should not be use at all.

This is refernce to:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/leaders-rethink-the-war-on-drugs-at-summit-of-the-americas/article2402426/page2/

The Globe and Mail

Drug Policy
Leaders rethink the war on drugs at Summit of the Americas
CAMPBELL CLARK AND MARINA JIMÉNEZ

Seed Newsvine

http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/02/pf/expert/money_marriage/
From
CNN Money

By Walter Updegrave @CNNMoney December 2, 2011: 3:16 PM ET
Talk money with your spouse -- and keep the peace

----------------------------

My take

The problem is:
What are you going to do when your wife starts to shout each time you suggest a plan. As long as she has her way, there is peace at home.

Oh, and please, never go on her wallet; because, you may find her secret credit cards; that will just show you her deceitful-partnership is in the marriage. Also, don’t try to have a budget, because what you will propose, if it puts any restriction on her spending, your wife will accuse you of tyranny, even when your spending is controlled by her.

Common, when you ask for her to sit and make a plan, she simply says, “We don’t make enough to have budget.” This is Feminism at its best. If you go to court, she will accuse of bossing her and being a tyrant; simple because you wanted to have a say in the house. And in any American court a women’s lie against her husband is sacred.

Forget about church’s help, the religious crowd will chastise you for being a tyrant, because you dared to make suggestions that your wife objected. They will not say it in simple language, they will just say ‘You two need to communicate better”. They will give you examples of happiness in the family when a husband listens (submits) to the wife). They even will give you examples of how wrong they learned they were, when their wives told them so.

Bu they will never mention a wife’s fallacy, or if they do is about common irrelevant situations. Nor do they encourage the wife to also listen to the husband. They will just tell the husband to list more to the wife.

Bottom line, if your wife “Was born to shop”, it does not matter; you are doomed. Just roll with the punches, turn the blind eye, and just exist. Hint, don’t bother looking at other women, for at that point, they all look pretty; and you get tempted, and then your wife will finally have something truthful to accuse of you of; afterwards, you are a no-good creature.

Just pray and be happy, or at least try to pretend to be happy in front of your children. Other men normally will deny it, but a few will open-up and tell you how Hell feels like, after a men failed to have a plan in choosing a wife. Whatever you do, be aware, the children are simply victims, even when they see their father as an encumbrance on their mother. Maternal brainwash is the worst form or terrorism.

Only the Minority

From:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/8672005/Savers-desert-stock-market-amid-fears-of-another-global-recession.html

The Telegraph, UK
Savers desert stock market amid fears of another global recession
By Emma Wall, Personal Finance Reporter
10:00PM BST 29 Jul 2011
-----------------------------------

My Take

So, the experts are predicting more misery. What is wrong with the world getting more poor people. We the poor are the majority. After all, it is only money, and even that, it is only money earned on the markets—not real money. And, what is wrong with being poor?

Those who become poor because of the stock market and because of other gambling strategies, will have more respect for the majority of the world’s population, whom they despise. As my father use to say: “By keeping on tightening the guitar’s strings, the tuner will end up pupping the strings”.

We never hear the investor’s complain when they rake in filthy lucre. They call it success to rise above their peers. But when they fall; oh, well, they just join the majority.

On the other hand, who wants to be the minority? Only the rich and the gentile, and those of noble birth, and the affluent, and those who are affluent regardless of ethnic lineage, they want to be the ruling minority.

Well, welcome to the real world of eating “by the sweat of your brow”. Oops, I forgot, those affluent and rich people are not supposed to work for a living, nor associate with those who labor with their hands (From Charles Dickens).

Hypnosis' Re-Incarantion; the Biggest Hoax of All Times.

Reference to:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/15/sunday/main20063019.shtml?tag=re1.discussed

Reincarnation: Believing in second chances

--------------------------------------------

My Viewpoint

The greatest hoax of all times has reincarnated in the academia, by chance or by capitalism, re-incarnation has come full fledge as the open hoax for the gullible to appear sophisticated under the protection of hypnosis.

First, let me say confidently that re-incarnation is a copout to criminals or sin lovers or anti –Christians who want to justify their deeds. The first clue to re-incarnation conflict appears when the spiritualist religion acknowledges hypnosis and forbids licensing as Spiritualists anyone who practices hypnosis. Even though both philosophies cross each other’s path, their cause is in opposite polarity.

The spiritualists who deal strictly with spirit from the non-Christian perspective, and are closer to pagan ideology. Normally they believe in re-incarnation, but state that they cannot prove it. The spiritualists perspective is based on Romanticism where each person is “In tune with everything, and therefore is part of the infinite”. They avoid the word God.

In spiritualism, good or bad doesn’t exist, rather only knowledge and ignorance exists while each individual controls his or her outcome. Their motivation is believing in being better than they have been. Normally Spiritualists praise that which is good and avoid evilness. It is similar to the philosophy of the gentry, polite under all circumstances.

On the opposite, the hypnotists’ philosophy is based on money, and hypnotists normally know nothing about spirits. Rather, they deal with the individual; but they treat regression based on oriental philosophy-or religion. Hypnotists include regression on in their training-optional for a fee. But, each hypnotist needs more training-hours to maintain their certification.

The point where hypnotists and spiritualist cross paths is when the hypnotist performs regression. As hypnosis deals with the subconscious, at times with deep hypnosis, the line can be crossed, where the subject goes into a limited trance. At this point the person hypnotized is not conscious of himself or herself.

Instead, the hypnotized person is on a state of perhaps semi-coma (a good area for research). In such deep hypnosis in regression the subject speaks almost as mumbling-different from regular hypnosis. In deep hypnosis, it is almost the same as being a medium—or person possessed by a spirit where the words are normally not in detailed intonation.

When a person is at this stage, of mediumship whether it is called regressional-hypnosis of a trance the results are the same. The person is open to spirits using that body to talk—a golden opportunity for a spirit. Many sprits are not even aware that they no longer have a body. Some spirits even deny being dead.

When such spirits talk inside other people they have the same personality that they had when they were mortals. Liars lie, show-offs do their thing, criers, cry and the list goes on.

Appears however, that the spirits have to be obedient to humans. Normally, spirits don’t identify themselves, others are still in shock without knowing where they are. Some ask for food, others ask drink, others even cigarettes or alcohol. There was an article about ten years ago (I think it was in Reader Digest), where a woman who never drank got all kinds of cravings for beer and motorcycles, after she received a transplant. After research, she found that she had received an organ from an alcoholic biker.

Because Hypnotists don’t admit or know anything in general about spirits, all that comes from the hypnotized person is taken a fact. Thus a spirit who lived, hundreds of years ago will tell you about that language or place and time in history.

However the hypnotized person gets the credit as if he or she was the same being. People whose lives have in talking to spirits, know how to ask questions. But who knows who is talking, there is not identity to prove how is how.

So regression is better explained as real for the person who regressed in knowledge, for after giving the hypnotist that good cash, the subject knows less about him or herself. Less than he or she thinks, because after regression he/she thinks to have been a bagger or a king hundreds of year ago.

Nevertheless, the human brain does contain a memory bank that can be accessed by hypnosis, trauma, or psychoanalysis. But, then the question gets bigger. For if we, existed before our bodies, as evidence shows in the bible; than, we also may remember where we were in spirit before we were born. So, the philosophy of re-incarnation is exposed as flawed.

My bases for my viewpoint is from my research into religion; for seven years visiting different religions, including paganism, and spiritualism. I was raised where spirits talked in people as routine--not pretty. Also, I practiced hypnotherapy for two years as a certified hypnotist—no regressions. My contact can be at one word “the lion scribe” at g mail.