Seed Newsvine

http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/02/pf/expert/money_marriage/
From
CNN Money

By Walter Updegrave @CNNMoney December 2, 2011: 3:16 PM ET
Talk money with your spouse -- and keep the peace

----------------------------

My take

The problem is:
What are you going to do when your wife starts to shout each time you suggest a plan. As long as she has her way, there is peace at home.

Oh, and please, never go on her wallet; because, you may find her secret credit cards; that will just show you her deceitful-partnership is in the marriage. Also, don’t try to have a budget, because what you will propose, if it puts any restriction on her spending, your wife will accuse you of tyranny, even when your spending is controlled by her.

Common, when you ask for her to sit and make a plan, she simply says, “We don’t make enough to have budget.” This is Feminism at its best. If you go to court, she will accuse of bossing her and being a tyrant; simple because you wanted to have a say in the house. And in any American court a women’s lie against her husband is sacred.

Forget about church’s help, the religious crowd will chastise you for being a tyrant, because you dared to make suggestions that your wife objected. They will not say it in simple language, they will just say ‘You two need to communicate better”. They will give you examples of happiness in the family when a husband listens (submits) to the wife). They even will give you examples of how wrong they learned they were, when their wives told them so.

Bu they will never mention a wife’s fallacy, or if they do is about common irrelevant situations. Nor do they encourage the wife to also listen to the husband. They will just tell the husband to list more to the wife.

Bottom line, if your wife “Was born to shop”, it does not matter; you are doomed. Just roll with the punches, turn the blind eye, and just exist. Hint, don’t bother looking at other women, for at that point, they all look pretty; and you get tempted, and then your wife will finally have something truthful to accuse of you of; afterwards, you are a no-good creature.

Just pray and be happy, or at least try to pretend to be happy in front of your children. Other men normally will deny it, but a few will open-up and tell you how Hell feels like, after a men failed to have a plan in choosing a wife. Whatever you do, be aware, the children are simply victims, even when they see their father as an encumbrance on their mother. Maternal brainwash is the worst form or terrorism.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/07/inappropriate-relationship-is-possible-motive-in-penis-severing-case/1?csp=obinsite

From:
USA TODAY
By Douglas Stanglin, USA TODAY
'Inappropriate relationship' is possible motive in penis-severing case


-------------
MY TAKE

If any similar mutilation would have been done by a husband to his wife, all the feminists and “woman-defenders” would be crying from the bottom of their lungs; but since the crime was done by a wife who showed no regrets and like normal feminists appears above the law, the author focused on the reason. Justification is normally used by criminals; thus the author appears as a crime condoner. The media in this case appears to look for a reason to justify another wife mutilating her husband.

A similar reaction appeared on a major American publisher—I don’t remember which, could research; in the case of the mom-Smith who murdered her children with her car to the pond. Case after case about vicious mothers and vicious wives are normally reported in apologetic mode. After all there is a judicial process, and the courts normally favor kindness to women over men. So, takes the law into her own hands was more pleasing—feminism at its best.

Where is the rage and the call for justice and the adjectives that would be used in this article if the crime was from the husband to wife. Heavy language is normally used for criminals when men commit similar crimes against woman? Instead, Douglas Stanglin, writes as if all is normal, or if that criminal wife could be justified.

USA TODAY’s editors are no better than the article’s author. Such tone to justify violence from women is adding fuel to the barbaric violence cycle flooding our society in the space age. Just as bad are the religious preachers who only see the negative of men’s crimes, but remain silent when women are the culprits; silence is approval.

Women's Infidelity

http://womensinfidelity.com/
Research and the Book
Michelle Langley
---------------------------------------

My Take

Research shows bias in Women-defenders.

We men have been and still are being discriminated by everyone from religious leaders to politicians; and, worse by the courts of divorce. Professional preachers, especially tell-evangelists, and the media, have been the enemies of the male gender, in top of what we suffer at home. Now, research by a women, brings more light to the nature of women.

Will the bigots repent? I doubt it. That is how they keep themselves from sleeping in the doghouse. By blaming other men for domestic violence, they show their oppressive wives that they are OK; such men have joined the feminist movement in male-bashing.

Bigots have always known the truth; but they did not have much evidence thrown at
them. Thus, biased people kept their crusade. If any man brought up evidence to show that women are culprits of domestic disharmony just like men and sometimes worse, those men who brought evidence, were chided and belittled even by other man; especially those in leadership positions, who benefit from numbers in population.

I had to prove my take on a journalism class in the University of Massachusetts in 1993. After being told that I “was going against the grain”. My bibliography was not enough. I was invited to bring in the research books and professional magazines. I did not see such requirements from other students’ research. I was the only-one who had to bring in the evidence—I am a man; and I was writing about equality on domestic violence.

In that research, I found that married, men have a greater chance of getting killed by their own wives, by 10%; I was threatened my “Ex-wife” while married. Also, I found that women start most of the violence at home. That complimented my own marriage that was in the midst of a divorce. The violent spouse got custody of the children, even after the judge knew that mom (My “EX”), had bitten our four year old daughter in the face.

The book in reference that lead me to write this piece, appears to be obscure to me. I did not yet read the book. I did not see any news about the topic; but the info in the add-info gives enough to know what is in the book. Granted, I sometimes go a few days without checking the news on the WEB; but, I normally surf the news.

However, I have about half dozed of main media publishers, sending me daily headlines. So, this info does not qualify for headlines. Well, it appears to be because the book exposes “women as being like or worse than men”. The major media appears to have disregarded the great book – it exposes feminism’s distortion. I bumped into the book Women's Infidelity by Michelle Langley, in a Google’s ad.