Standing for the truth and fighting corruption is the kind of thinking we need today. It is better to die with honor—brook or not, even if it means burning all the bridges, then to live rich and while being a crook.
Secrecy and corruption is precisely what destroys good organizations on the long run—history speaks for itself. Mr. Smith is on the side of those whom have contributed to the ethics idealism that is at the surface of the American culture. Most of the world envy America, because but their leaders don’t want to burn bridges. Thus perpetuating corruption and contributing to the disintegration of society, they lack a spine and ethics.
The housing mess that we are in, could have been smaller-to say the least, if transparency and ethics had any place in our financial machine. “
The truth shall make your free”
---------------------------------
In reference to the following
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/goldman-executive-resigns-via-public-letter/
A moment
"I think, therefore I am"
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Enough alimony--no more laofing
In refernce to CNN's alimony reform in MA
About time that loafers have to start living like people. What happen to the bigots who passed the original law? This the tip of the iceberg. I have been hungry and cold to pay child support, even after some of my children were married or adults. One woman's lie in court is worth a stack of bibles. Part of the problem is governors’ staffing the courts with liberal women judges.
There is not a place in the area that I have not placed my resume to at some time. Once out of work and over 40, the snowball starts to roll. I am still severely behind. Hopefully things will change with better employment; I have been called for a job-interview soon.
Judges side with women rather than with the purpose of the law—especially women judges. Such women judges are simple overpaid bigots. My ex-contempt of court in tax returns allowances was not considered by the woman judging in my case.
I had to pay the fines because of her cheating on the tax forms, thus causing me to lose returns and pay fines because she had already claimed my court decreed dependents—this happened for about ten years.
I may even get arrested because I have not been properly employed; thus severely behind in payments. However, she kept one premise, that is: “If I thought she was not nice, I would have to wait until de divorce to find out how bad she was.” She kept that part of her word.
We need to vote for real people, rather than for clowns as our reps and congressman; and political party does not mean anything—feminism does.
About time that loafers have to start living like people. What happen to the bigots who passed the original law? This the tip of the iceberg. I have been hungry and cold to pay child support, even after some of my children were married or adults. One woman's lie in court is worth a stack of bibles. Part of the problem is governors’ staffing the courts with liberal women judges.
There is not a place in the area that I have not placed my resume to at some time. Once out of work and over 40, the snowball starts to roll. I am still severely behind. Hopefully things will change with better employment; I have been called for a job-interview soon.
Judges side with women rather than with the purpose of the law—especially women judges. Such women judges are simple overpaid bigots. My ex-contempt of court in tax returns allowances was not considered by the woman judging in my case.
I had to pay the fines because of her cheating on the tax forms, thus causing me to lose returns and pay fines because she had already claimed my court decreed dependents—this happened for about ten years.
I may even get arrested because I have not been properly employed; thus severely behind in payments. However, she kept one premise, that is: “If I thought she was not nice, I would have to wait until de divorce to find out how bad she was.” She kept that part of her word.
We need to vote for real people, rather than for clowns as our reps and congressman; and political party does not mean anything—feminism does.
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Understanding The LDS faith could reduce the criticism
The criticism is not about faith, rather it about the critics trying to interfere in a particular religion.
Please, let us be reasonable, and let’s see how someone’s name may appear for baptism under the conditions accused by the critics.
First, the LDS church does not pick who will be baptized or who will not be. So stating that someone was baptized again by the LDS church is showing the lack of understanding that such critics have of the LDS Church. Yes, even most members do not know how to avoid duplicating work. They just have no idea that the work is being duplicated.
Also, if a person has a deceased relative for whom he or she wants to do vicarious work, that person is not going to see if the critics approve.
Again, baptism duplicity has occurred even when names are not in the critics watch list. There is a lot of work in clearing-up the mess too. So insinuating that the LDS Church is being less than honest, is a calculated insult. The church constantly advises people to recheck names and sources, to avoid duplicating work.
However, the people practicing their faith and trying to help deceased relatives are normally not professional genealogists. Thus they are not always able to clear every obstacle to see if someone’s vicarious work has already been done.
Names and places appear in history where the researcher sometimes may thing of being in one area, but actually being in another. Many people appear with the same names, and from areas with the geographic similarities. Also, a deceased person may have different relatives independently trying to do the same work for their ancestors. In most instances they don’t know each other. Thus, they end-up duplicating work. That is precisely the reason that the LDS church has spent lots of money trying to help people in avoiding duplications.
As far as mentioning that the vicarious work was done in a Temple in the Dominican Republic is insinuating that the church is trying to hide and continue to do something contrary to what they say. Well, the reality of such work is that in many cases, the people who submit their relatives’ names are unable to do such work, or they just submit their relatives’ names expecting volunteers to finish such work. That is why a name may appear in areas that may not be near their relatives, or not near where the name was submitted.
But, the bottom line is: Spirits are free to choose. There in no one there forcing spirits to accept or reject vicarious work. The issue appears to be that those who are anti-religion or anti-LDS, are trying to restrict the practice religious freedom.
Actually, if critics are so concerned about spirits or about dead people, could it be that such critics actually know that spirits do live waiting for the resurrection? It appears so. Otherwise the critics would let each person practice their religion as they choose. It is the critics who are trying to dictate what a dead person/spirit can or cannot have.
__________________
Reference to:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/mormons-posthumous-baptism-anne-frank_n_1292102.html
Mormon Baptism Targets Anne Frank – Again
Please, let us be reasonable, and let’s see how someone’s name may appear for baptism under the conditions accused by the critics.
First, the LDS church does not pick who will be baptized or who will not be. So stating that someone was baptized again by the LDS church is showing the lack of understanding that such critics have of the LDS Church. Yes, even most members do not know how to avoid duplicating work. They just have no idea that the work is being duplicated.
Also, if a person has a deceased relative for whom he or she wants to do vicarious work, that person is not going to see if the critics approve.
Again, baptism duplicity has occurred even when names are not in the critics watch list. There is a lot of work in clearing-up the mess too. So insinuating that the LDS Church is being less than honest, is a calculated insult. The church constantly advises people to recheck names and sources, to avoid duplicating work.
However, the people practicing their faith and trying to help deceased relatives are normally not professional genealogists. Thus they are not always able to clear every obstacle to see if someone’s vicarious work has already been done.
Names and places appear in history where the researcher sometimes may thing of being in one area, but actually being in another. Many people appear with the same names, and from areas with the geographic similarities. Also, a deceased person may have different relatives independently trying to do the same work for their ancestors. In most instances they don’t know each other. Thus, they end-up duplicating work. That is precisely the reason that the LDS church has spent lots of money trying to help people in avoiding duplications.
As far as mentioning that the vicarious work was done in a Temple in the Dominican Republic is insinuating that the church is trying to hide and continue to do something contrary to what they say. Well, the reality of such work is that in many cases, the people who submit their relatives’ names are unable to do such work, or they just submit their relatives’ names expecting volunteers to finish such work. That is why a name may appear in areas that may not be near their relatives, or not near where the name was submitted.
But, the bottom line is: Spirits are free to choose. There in no one there forcing spirits to accept or reject vicarious work. The issue appears to be that those who are anti-religion or anti-LDS, are trying to restrict the practice religious freedom.
Actually, if critics are so concerned about spirits or about dead people, could it be that such critics actually know that spirits do live waiting for the resurrection? It appears so. Otherwise the critics would let each person practice their religion as they choose. It is the critics who are trying to dictate what a dead person/spirit can or cannot have.
__________________
Reference to:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/mormons-posthumous-baptism-anne-frank_n_1292102.html
Mormon Baptism Targets Anne Frank – Again
IRAN Saying - Israel's Collapse
Reference to: The Washington Post
-------
MY TAKE
Anxiety
Does that means, Iran is eager to be attacked by Israel. Iran has repeatedly stated that Israel must be wiped-out. Iran’s comments sound like Saddam Hussein’s “The mother of all battles” which translated to the mother of all defeats. Iran sounds like it is trying to finish what Hitler started; the problem is that: This time the Jews have teeth.
Granted, the selected people of God, according to the bible, are going with the same tendencies that they had before Nebuchadnezzar destroy Jerusalem. So the Ayatollah thinks that he can play god. But, even Nebuchadnezzar did have consideration for the Jews.
If the Ayatollah and the Mullahs think that they have the authority to kill and eradicate the people whom so many tried to wipe off the earth before, than they need to read the bible again. They do read the bible. Times have changed, and the bible does give an account of what will happen.
Despite Israel’s mundaneness there is much more freedom in Israel that the Iranians or the Persians ever had. Freedom is what the Ayatollahs fear--people being able to think for themselves, therefore being able to choose. Choice is what makes us human beings.
-------
MY TAKE
Anxiety
Does that means, Iran is eager to be attacked by Israel. Iran has repeatedly stated that Israel must be wiped-out. Iran’s comments sound like Saddam Hussein’s “The mother of all battles” which translated to the mother of all defeats. Iran sounds like it is trying to finish what Hitler started; the problem is that: This time the Jews have teeth.
Granted, the selected people of God, according to the bible, are going with the same tendencies that they had before Nebuchadnezzar destroy Jerusalem. So the Ayatollah thinks that he can play god. But, even Nebuchadnezzar did have consideration for the Jews.
If the Ayatollah and the Mullahs think that they have the authority to kill and eradicate the people whom so many tried to wipe off the earth before, than they need to read the bible again. They do read the bible. Times have changed, and the bible does give an account of what will happen.
Despite Israel’s mundaneness there is much more freedom in Israel that the Iranians or the Persians ever had. Freedom is what the Ayatollahs fear--people being able to think for themselves, therefore being able to choose. Choice is what makes us human beings.
ROMNEY Forcing Higher Retirement Age?
My TAKE
Mitt Romney has a lot of courage, but is it honesty? The government instituted Social Security not as a handout, but as garnished money from US workers. As it is, some organizations that were able to have private retirement, have done better than the government forced retirement. It shows that the government is a poor manager of its citizen’s money.
Now, comes Romney and wants to force a change on the contract for the worse. Romney’s enforcement will affect those who worked all their lives in the hope of being able to eat when they can’t find a job because of age. Romney now wants those people to suffer even more—that is breach of contract.
Many poor people have had layoffs as part of their lives, especially after shutdowns—some of us count up to 5 direct shutdowns. Those of us who have had to choose between being cold and putting food on the table, are the folks who will be forced to pay for Mr. Millionaire Romney’s election promises. Unless, he plans not following through with it.
Romney already forced the poor people in Massachusetts to choose between paying for forced health-care, or buying food for the table. Now, he wants to make the entire US population suffer even more; by increments, the sneaky way.
We normally can’t find people over 60 working in Mr. Millionaire Romney’s stores. Which means that Romney’s stores—SAPLES, don’t hire the people whom Mr. Romney wants to forbid in getting what the government had promised—retirement at 65.
Romney has not suggested cutting government salaries or adjusting it to national average. In some cases government employees are paid more than in the private sector. How about an across-the-board cut? It is taxpayers’ money, Mr. Romney.
Please Mr. Romney, try to see what it is like to be poor. Go to an unemployment line and borrow a man’s resume from anyone over 50, and use it yourself under the other guy’s conditions. Then, you can see what you are trying to do, to those who worked all their lives at a disadvantage. Perhaps, then, you can understand what it is to be poor, and then being robbed by the government too, as you are proposing.
--------------------------
In Reference to:
DAVID ESPO, AP article at --
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jTUl0cCza-peaS7XCIPp0tujb6Tw?docId=1ed5b0fd1c014eab9f9cf916bcc10cbb
Mitt Romney has a lot of courage, but is it honesty? The government instituted Social Security not as a handout, but as garnished money from US workers. As it is, some organizations that were able to have private retirement, have done better than the government forced retirement. It shows that the government is a poor manager of its citizen’s money.
Now, comes Romney and wants to force a change on the contract for the worse. Romney’s enforcement will affect those who worked all their lives in the hope of being able to eat when they can’t find a job because of age. Romney now wants those people to suffer even more—that is breach of contract.
Many poor people have had layoffs as part of their lives, especially after shutdowns—some of us count up to 5 direct shutdowns. Those of us who have had to choose between being cold and putting food on the table, are the folks who will be forced to pay for Mr. Millionaire Romney’s election promises. Unless, he plans not following through with it.
Romney already forced the poor people in Massachusetts to choose between paying for forced health-care, or buying food for the table. Now, he wants to make the entire US population suffer even more; by increments, the sneaky way.
We normally can’t find people over 60 working in Mr. Millionaire Romney’s stores. Which means that Romney’s stores—SAPLES, don’t hire the people whom Mr. Romney wants to forbid in getting what the government had promised—retirement at 65.
Romney has not suggested cutting government salaries or adjusting it to national average. In some cases government employees are paid more than in the private sector. How about an across-the-board cut? It is taxpayers’ money, Mr. Romney.
Please Mr. Romney, try to see what it is like to be poor. Go to an unemployment line and borrow a man’s resume from anyone over 50, and use it yourself under the other guy’s conditions. Then, you can see what you are trying to do, to those who worked all their lives at a disadvantage. Perhaps, then, you can understand what it is to be poor, and then being robbed by the government too, as you are proposing.
--------------------------
In Reference to:
DAVID ESPO, AP article at --
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jTUl0cCza-peaS7XCIPp0tujb6Tw?docId=1ed5b0fd1c014eab9f9cf916bcc10cbb
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Enough is Enough! Throw her the book, please; forget gender. --- in reference to LA Times
Mother accused of drowning children may be mentally ill, police say
February 15, 2012 | 4:44 pm
---------------------------------------------
My Take
Simple go by crime similarities. What is good for one criminal is good for next criminal.
Anytime a father or any other man, commits a crime against the family, the media and the police search for the harshest words and demand punishment for such evilness. Men are never emotional disturbed, or suffer depression, or had nasty upbringings. The label is there mean, evil, nasty, tyrant, etc.
Anyone who commits a crime is not on its right mind, except professional criminals and people with deficiencies.
When a mother kills her children, or kills her husband, or is verbally or physically abusive to her husband or to her children, the police and media don’t get tired looking for excuses to show the woman as innocent. This is simple bigotry; it has become a pattern.
Those who protect criminals are criminals too, whether they are cops, prosecutors, judges, or common feminists, they are bigots, they have shown their biases. Anyone who reads the news will plainly see the same bigotry displayed by the media. Worse yet, religionists are no better.
Go to any church and men are being bashed in the name of God, and woman are always innocent or victims. Or, women are holly and incapable of committing anything wrong. Women have a reserved place in heaven. Some women even claim that women are smarter than men. Even in churches men are stigmatized as dumb, tyrants, lazy or worthless.
In other words, tyranny and feminism rule the so called free world. We demand equality and equal justice for all. Women have proven they are equal to men.
Therefore they must accept responsibility for their acts equally to men.
--------------
you can get the LA times at:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/mother-accused-in-childrens-drowning.html?track=lat-pick
Mother accused of drowning children may be mentally ill, police say
February 15, 2012 | 4:44 pm
---------------------------------------------
My Take
Simple go by crime similarities. What is good for one criminal is good for next criminal.
Anytime a father or any other man, commits a crime against the family, the media and the police search for the harshest words and demand punishment for such evilness. Men are never emotional disturbed, or suffer depression, or had nasty upbringings. The label is there mean, evil, nasty, tyrant, etc.
Anyone who commits a crime is not on its right mind, except professional criminals and people with deficiencies.
When a mother kills her children, or kills her husband, or is verbally or physically abusive to her husband or to her children, the police and media don’t get tired looking for excuses to show the woman as innocent. This is simple bigotry; it has become a pattern.
Those who protect criminals are criminals too, whether they are cops, prosecutors, judges, or common feminists, they are bigots, they have shown their biases. Anyone who reads the news will plainly see the same bigotry displayed by the media. Worse yet, religionists are no better.
Go to any church and men are being bashed in the name of God, and woman are always innocent or victims. Or, women are holly and incapable of committing anything wrong. Women have a reserved place in heaven. Some women even claim that women are smarter than men. Even in churches men are stigmatized as dumb, tyrants, lazy or worthless.
In other words, tyranny and feminism rule the so called free world. We demand equality and equal justice for all. Women have proven they are equal to men.
Therefore they must accept responsibility for their acts equally to men.
--------------
you can get the LA times at:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/mother-accused-in-childrens-drowning.html?track=lat-pick
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Whose Fault? WikiLeaks, Manning, or the Recuiter?
Seed Newsvinehttp://www.torontosun.com/2011/12/27/worthington-wikileaks-no-threat
Toronto Sun
By Peter Worthington ,QMI Agency
Worthington: Wikileaks no threat
As 2011 draws to a close, the issue of WikiLeaks disclosures remains to be resolved — a breach of trust to some, the right to know to others.
----------------------------------
MY TAKE
If WikiLeaks becomes shut, then the world governments will feel free to oppress humanity. Regardless of price, appears that the US Justice Department wants to save face. Also,
if they can get Assange into the US, they can instill fear on anyone who dares to think about spilling a US secret, while at the same time encourage freedom of the internet for others. Up to an extant the government appears to be correct. But the abuse of classifying everything as secret, keeps the public in the dark.
Assange didnot take an oath not did he serve in the US armed forces. If the US will prosecute Assange, they will be able to psychological cause fear on any foreign for doing anything that
might be deeming bad for the US, regardless of intent. While it is good for the US, it is bad for
freedom of speech.
It is little by little that freedom becomes extinct. As it is, we can’t talk freely inside an airport; we can’t mention bombs or weapons, or hijacking. If the newspaper says that, we can only read it silently. How much more freedom will governments take form their citizens?
Instead of using Israelis’ methods of terrorism control, the TSA has an iron fist in the
land of free, causing people to have the dilemma of being physically handle by TSA
thugs, or being bombarded with x-rays. They get our naked description for the perverts to laugh at, as it has been done.
Compared with Israel, we are going backward on freedom. If extremists hate any country, they hate Israel much more than the USA. Yet Israel uses civilized methods of controlling terrorist without taking people’s rights away. So, why aren’t we being civilized? Because we have been voting for idiots instead of honest politicians—there must be some honest politicians who can be people friendly.
The US has the capability of doing better. Punish those who take oaths, those who did not do their job. But, to punish those who advocate freedom is destroying the core of freedom.
For Manning to bring abuses into light was heroic, for even under the Genevea convention those with knowledge are responsible to report; but disclosing things unrelated to abuse, was betrayal to the oath he took, and he was doing the opposite of what he was getting paid for; to do his job, he cheated by releasing info unrelated to abuse.
But since Manning did volunteer for the army, seems that the recruiter might have done
his quarters. Manning might have been a victim of recruiting, where the victim is only told enough to sign in the line and commit. It is not uncommon for people enlisting in the military, and then find that they got sucked into a vacuum.
Perhaps the military should show more to recruits, instead of using psychology to get people
committed into something they regret when they see reality. But, with a nasty economy, and hunger versus being a soldier, what is there to choose, but believing an hiring professional trained to manipulate those anxious for stability.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)